MS 30th Anniversary XXX

Atienza book to be launched today

While published accounts of the historic four days of the internationally-known peaceful EDSA People Power Revolution are plenty—with some more accurate and truthful than others—not many have delved into some important factors that actually helped make it possible. In his newly-released autobiography entitled “Light from My Father’s Shadow,” Jose “Lito” Atienza—former environment secretary—recounts some of recent Philippine history’s most critical moments. Recollecting  the days under the Marcos dictatorship, Atienza’s book describes in depth the role of the political  opposition. For during the Interim Batasang Pambansa elections. “There the simple participation of people worked to spread the message: ‘Ninoy was cheated...join the nation in delivering a message to Marcos…’ As scheduled, at 6 pm on that day, the whole of Metro Manila  erupted in an orgy of noise that was so loud, so sustained and so widespread it shook the foundations of  the dictatorship… “For figures like Teofisto ‘Tito’ Guingona, Jr. and other opposition leaders were brusquely dragged to jail that  afternoon. But the noise barrage was widely successful. The barrage was not merely a protest against the cheating first proof that people were already awakening to the reality that Marcos was abusing his constitutional  mandate. For the oppositionists, the success of the noise barrage opened our eyes to the truth: ‘Marami pala tayo at pwede palang lumaban’… In leaders who had the foresight to eschew the boycott option during the 1984 parliamentary elections. With a landslide win in Metro Manila, and with surprising electoral victories even in once-“solid Marcos” areas across the Philippines, the participation advocates were proven right, Atienza points out. “It certainly inspired the other oppositionists. If the boycott movement had succeeded, then we would not  have of Marcos, the weakening of his iron hold.”
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by The Standard. Comments are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with The Standard editorial standards, The Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.